Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

By Haiti Diaspora Voice
An unapologetic, truth-teller’s deep dive into a pivotal but under-examined exchange between two giants of our Revolution—Dessalines and Christophe. We recover voices muted by colonial distortion and internal politicking, connecting their urgency and vision to our ongoing struggle for truth and freedom.

By the close of the 1790s, Saint-Domingue had become the epicenter of the world’s most explosive emancipation movement. Former enslaved men and women had overturned centuries of brutal plantation rule, battling French, English, and Spanish armies alike. In the wake of Horatio Nelson’s defeat of the British and Toussaint Louverture’s uneasy peace with France, General Jean-Jacques Dessalines stood as one of the Revolution’s fiercest champions of total liberation.
Yet by 1799, tensions ran high among the Revolution’s leaders. Toussaint Louverture’s growing authority—tempered by his clandestine negotiations with France—stoked fears that the Revolution’s radical, anti-colonial momentum might stall or be betrayed. Dessalines, distrustful of half-measures and wary of any French designs to reinstate slavery, had broken openly with Toussaint. Across the northern plains, the young officer Henry Christophe sought to navigate these shifting loyalties, balancing pragmatism against the hard-won ideals of emancipation.
It was in this crucible of suspicion and ambition that Dessalines penned his letter of 22 Fructidor, an Septième (8 September 1799). Far more than a mere dispatch, the letter crackles with urgency: a charge to Christophe to recall the Revolution’s core promise and to resist any compromise with imperial France. In those few pages, Dessalines lays bare the stakes facing Black freedom—his warning remains a testament to the urgency of solidarity amid internecine rifts.
In reclaiming this exchange, we confront how subsequent historians—both colonial apologists and complicit Haitian elites—have minimized the friction between these titans. The letter reveals how ideological purity and militant resolve drove the Revolution forward, even as leadership fractured. By revisiting Dessalines’s words to Christophe, we reawaken a dialogue too often sidelined: the fierce debates that shaped Haiti’s independence and the cost paid by those who dared demand nothing less than total freedom.

Colonial narratives cast Saint-Domingue’s leaders as treacherous schemers or incompetent upstarts—never as visionary architects of a multiracial republic. Western historiography recast Dessalines’s break with Louverture as personal ambition, ignoring his consistent stance against half-measures on emancipation.
Meanwhile, post-independence Haitian historiography has often traded nuance for stability. Leaders like Christophe, who later established his own kingdom in the north, became simplistically labeled as power-hungry royalty, while Dessalines was alternately lionized or vilified. This binary framing erases the legitimate policy debates about foreign alliances, land reform, and racial equality that animated correspondence like the 22 Fructidor letter.
By sidelining Dessalines’s admonitions and reducing Christophe’s responses to caricature, many accounts obscure how revolutionary ideals were tempered by pragmatic exigencies. We lose sight of the fact that these men wrestled, fiercely and sincerely, over how to preserve emancipation against renewed colonial threats. Recovering their private exchange restores complexity to the Revolution—illuminating the sacrifices, misgivings, and relentless vigilance required to secure freedom.

“Mon cher Christophe,
The tremors of French betrayal grow daily more ominous. Remember our oath: liberté ou la mort. Any dalliance with those who once owned us is a dagger at the Republic’s throat. Rally your battalions not for personal gain, but for the sacred trust of our people.“Look to the plains of Artibonite—where mulatto officers whisper of compromise—and to Port-au-Prince, where Toussaint’s ministers entreat a return under French colors. You know my pain: to make parley with any nation that trafficked in our bodies is to cheapen every drop of blood we have shed.
“I charge you, Christophe, to hold the line. Should France attempt to reinstate its horrors, you will stand the bulwark. Should any man, however honored, seek to erode our freedom by treaty or by trick, you will strike him down. Our ancestors demand no less.”


Across two centuries, Haiti has faced renewed economic coercion, political interventions, and narratives casting its leaders as incapable. Today’s struggles—IMF-imposed austerity, foreign debt traps, structural racism—mirror the existential challenges Dessalines foresaw in 1799.
The letter’s core message—vigilance against any form of re-subjugation—resonates with contemporary activists. Solidarity must extend from Port-au-Prince to diaspora capitals, refusing token representation and demanding genuine self-determination. As Christophe balanced reality with principle, today’s organizers navigate digital networks, international NGOs, and local power brokers. Dessalines’s charge reminds us: co-option is the enemy of change.
Haitian history cannot be parceled into sanitized anecdotes for foreign consumption. We must:
Only by confronting the suppressed debates of Dessalines and Christophe can we fortify today’s movements against co-optation and betrayal.
The letter of 22 Fructidor, an Septième stands as a clarion call across time. Dessalines’s unflinching admonitions to Christophe reveal not grandstanding, but the gravity of leading a revolution that dared imagine Black equality in the belly of empire. Their correspondence underscores a vital truth: liberation demands both sword and scrutiny, bravery and unyielding principle.
Reclaiming these erased dialogues does more than correct textbooks—it revives the militant heartbeat of our ancestors. It reminds us that freedom was never given; it was seized through fierce debate, solidarity, and sacrifice. As we confront the lingering shadows of colonial power, let Dessalines’s words steel our resolve: to resist all forms of servitude, to honor every forgotten fighter, and to build a future grounded in truth, justice, and collective empowerment.
1. Why is the letter of 22 Fructidor significant?
It exposes the deep ideological rifts among Haitian leaders and clarifies Dessalines’s unwavering stance against any compromise with France.
2. How were Dessalines’s views misrepresented?
Colonial apologists and some Haitian elites recast his defiance as personal ambition rather than principled resistance.
3. Who were the “unsung heroes” impacted by this debate?
Maroons like Gédéon, women spies in Cap-Français, and local militia captains whose covert work sustained the Revolution.
4. What parallels exist between 1799 and Haiti’s challenges today?
External economic pressures and internal political deals continue to threaten full sovereignty and grassroots empowerment.
5. How can I help preserve these historical truths?
Support Haitian-led archives, elevate primary documents, challenge sanitized narratives, and share recovered histories with your community.
6. What does this letter teach about revolutionary leadership?
True leadership demands both strategic acumen and moral clarity—refusing false bargains that betray popular struggle.
7. Where can I read more primary documents from the Haitian Revolution?
Consult Haitian national archives, university special collections (e.g., Library of Congress, Tulane University), and digital repositories like the Digital Library of the Caribbean.https://haitidiasporavoice.com/